tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post3827623278815664138..comments2023-10-02T08:09:03.390-07:00Comments on Dr. Stu's Blog. I am delighted you are here and hope you find my insights enlightening. : Even on Vacation....Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00256992700668675213noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post-62369277973256014362011-02-04T05:28:29.016-08:002011-02-04T05:28:29.016-08:00Very well stated. This woman obviously has no int...Very well stated. This woman obviously has no intention of publicly debating, but how I would love to see it!Laura Humphreyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01945636255811866635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post-63235100979485215742011-02-04T05:25:18.524-08:002011-02-04T05:25:18.524-08:00You are a brave man to take on the spin doctor!You are a brave man to take on the spin doctor!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post-85443333323046466552011-02-03T22:00:05.295-08:002011-02-03T22:00:05.295-08:00And my response to Dr. Tuteur's nonresponsiven...And my response to Dr. Tuteur's nonresponsiveness:<br /><br />Public Debate request #2<br /><br />Dear Dr. Tuteur, Your response in nonresponsive. We are not surprised. Debates are designed for each participant to present their data and for the audience to learn and possibly decide which they choose to believe. Why would I need to find out any numbers for you? You must already have definitive evidence and numbers against MANA in order to make your statements against them. Or did you libel MANA just for fun? Again, here is your chance to bridge your gap of foolishness to attain some credibility. The debate offer still stands. I remind you it was your challenge which I have accepted. As for my past history, while irrelevant to the MANA topic, we can spend time at the opening of the debate discussing both our personal histories, credentials, training and experience in this field. With all due respect, Amy, ad hominum attacks are the weapons of those without an argument. You have my email. <br /><br />Sincerely, Dr. Fischbein<br />February 3, 2011 9:26AMAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00256992700668675213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post-19274454178043138532011-02-03T21:17:04.834-08:002011-02-03T21:17:04.834-08:00Excellent. I look forward to it, if it happens.Excellent. I look forward to it, if it happens.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post-59127343609727134312011-02-03T20:48:32.507-08:002011-02-03T20:48:32.507-08:00This was Amy's response:
"Do you know ho...This was Amy's response:<br /><br />"Do you know how many babies died?I'm confused, Dr. Fischbein. What is there to debate about the fact that MANA is hiding the number of babies who died at the hands of CPMs? If you know the number, please share it with the public, because American women have a right to know the truth.<br /><br />If you don't know the number, why don't you try to find out for the rest of us. You have extensive contacts in the world of homebirth advocacy. Surely MANA would tell you how many babies died. Or do you think that it is acceptable for MANA to hide the truth about the dangers of homebirth?<br /><br />* By the way, I think readers deserve to know that Dr. Fischbein and I have tangled publicly in the past when I wrote about his conviction for sexual exploitation of a patient."<br /><br />- The Skeptical OB February 2, 2011 11:45AMKim Lane, CPM, LM [VA] (formerly Kim Mosny)https://www.blogger.com/profile/14539630157335434198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-553033253431866006.post-47755722512758783242011-02-02T11:34:53.340-08:002011-02-02T11:34:53.340-08:00Can't wait to hear the response.Can't wait to hear the response.juliadouliahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10897300340511359289noreply@blogger.com